Caitlin Clark scored 32 points and Kelsey Mitchell added 28 as the Indiana Fever defeated the Seattle Storm 105–95 at Climate Pledge Arena on July 28, 2026, the latest completed meeting verified for this article. Natisha Hiedeman led all scorers with 33 points, but Seattle could not overcome Indiana’s efficient shooting and perfect performance at the free-throw line.
For readers searching for Seattle Storm vs Indiana Fever match player stats, the key figures below belong exclusively to that July 28 WNBA regular-season game.
Seattle Storm vs Indiana Fever Player Stats
Game date: July 28, 2026
Venue: Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle
Final score: Indiana Fever 105, Seattle Storm 95
The following table highlights the leading scorers and selected contributors. FG, 3PT and FT show makes and attempts.
| Player | Team | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlin Clark | Indiana | 32 | 4 | 7 | 9–14 | 4–7 | 10–10 |
| Kelsey Mitchell | Indiana | 28 | 2 | 2 | 9–18 | 4–7 | 6–6 |
| Monique Billings | Indiana | 14 | 11 | 1 | 4–6 | 0–0 | 6–6 |
| Aliyah Boston | Indiana | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4–7 | 1–2 | 2–2 |
| Sophie Cunningham | Indiana | 11 | 5 | 2 | 3–6 | 3–4 | 2–2 |
| Natisha Hiedeman | Seattle | 33 | 6 | 4 | 11–20 | 6–10 | 5–8 |
| Flau’jae Johnson | Seattle | 16 | 3 | 2 | 4–15 | 0–6 | 8–9 |
| Awa Fam | Seattle | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4–13 | 1–6 | 2–2 |
| Zia Cooke | Seattle | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2–8 | 2–3 | 4–6 |
| Jade Melbourne | Seattle | 8 | 3 | 4 | 4–7 | 0–2 | 0–0 |
Clark and Mitchell Delivered at the Critical Moments
Indiana’s starting guards combined for 60 points, giving the Fever two reliable scoring options when Seattle threatened a comeback.
Clark’s performance combined scoring efficiency with playmaking: she needed only 14 field-goal attempts to reach 32 points and also supplied seven assists. Mitchell provided a different kind of pressure, matching Clark’s four made three-pointers while taking on a larger shooting workload. Their individual production is supported by the game’s statistical records.
The decisive sequence came across the third and fourth quarters. Seattle cut the deficit to 65–63 on an Awa Fam three-pointer, but Clark scored 16 of Indiana’s 18 third-quarter points. Mitchell then hit consecutive threes early in the fourth, helping extend the lead to 85–76.
That sequence explains the result better than the final margin alone. Seattle created a genuine opportunity to change the game; Indiana answered through its strongest scorers before the Storm could complete the turnaround.
Hiedeman Gave Seattle a Chance
Hiedeman’s 33 points were a career high, according to the Associated Press recap published by the WNBA. She made six three-pointers and kept Seattle competitive despite its early deficit.
Her scoring mattered because Seattle needed to recover from a difficult opening quarter. The Storm had enough offense to mount a challenge, but keeping pace with Indiana required sustained efficiency rather than isolated productive stretches.
Hiedeman supplied the standout individual performance for Seattle. The wider lesson, however, is that even a game-high scoring total cannot fully offset an opponent receiving major production from both starting guards.
Team Statistics Explain Indiana’s Advantage
| Category | Indiana Fever | Seattle Storm |
|---|---|---|
| Field goals | 33–64 | 32–79 |
| Field-goal percentage | 51.6% | 40.5% |
| Three-pointers | 13–24 | 11–34 |
| Three-point percentage | 54.2% | 32.4% |
| Free throws | 26–26 | 20–27 |
| Player rebounds | 36 | 36 |
| Offensive rebounds | 6 | 16 |
| Assists | 16 | 17 |
The rebounding figures above represent rebounds credited to players, excluding separate team rebounds.
Seattle attempted 15 more field goals, helped by its advantage on the offensive glass. Indiana nevertheless made one more basket.
That is the central statistical contrast: Seattle generated additional opportunities, while Indiana converted a much greater share of its shots. More possessions and second chances only become decisive when they produce enough points.
Three-point shooting and free throws further separated the teams. Calculated from the verified totals, Indiana outscored Seattle by six points from beyond the arc and six at the line. Seattle’s two-point baskets reduced that combined advantage, leaving the final 10-point margin.
Read more : Denver Broncos vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Week 14
Boston’s Exit Added Context to the Win
Boston left during the second quarter after a hard fall involving a lower-leg injury and did not return. That description reflects the contemporary game report; it does not establish a subsequent diagnosis or recovery timetable.
Her departure made Indiana’s ability to maintain its scoring especially significant. Billings’ double-double supplied a valuable interior contribution, while the guards carried the largest offensive burden.
The result moved Indiana to 18–10 and Seattle to 6–24 at that point in the season. Those are postgame records from July 28, rather than current standings or final-season records.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the latest verified Seattle Storm vs Indiana Fever game?
Indiana won 105–95 in Seattle on July 28, 2026. The retrieved head-to-head record identifies it as their latest completed meeting.
How many points did Caitlin Clark score?
Clark scored 32 points, with four rebounds and seven assists.
Who was the game’s leading scorer?
Seattle’s Natisha Hiedeman led all players with 33 points.
Which player recorded a double-double?
Monique Billings finished with 14 points and 11 rebounds for Indiana.
What was the biggest statistical difference?
Shooting efficiency: Indiana made 51.6% of its field goals and 54.2% of its threes, compared with Seattle’s 40.5% and 32.4%.
Conclusion
The Seattle Storm vs Indiana Fever match player stats show why Indiana prevailed: its guards delivered under pressure, and its shooting made up for Seattle’s extra opportunities. Hiedeman’s outstanding night kept the Storm involved, but Indiana produced the stronger response when the game tightened.
In future meetings, watch whether Seattle can turn its additional possessions into a more efficient offense. Follow our sports coverage for the next verified matchup breakdown.
Read more : Denver Broncos vs New England Patriots Match Player Stats: Latest Result
